Model S為了閃鹿翻落邊坡約150公尺 - 汽車

Odelette avatar
By Odelette
at 2017-04-20T02:41

Table of Contents

上周一位希望匿名的Tesla Model S車主載著乘客要前往Oakland hills

途經Grizzly Peak Blvd時,有隻鹿讓他反應過度以至翻落邊坡

車子大概翻滾了50-60幾公尺後四輪朝天的倒下

最後在距離邊坡約150公尺的地方停了下來

駕駛跟乘客都還清醒著,並發現車室幾乎是完整的

當他們從天窗爬出之後才知道車子的損壞情形

另外他們用"totally OK"來形容他們的狀況,身上只有烏青跟肌肉痠痛

車主說因為他的Tesla,讓他很幸運的還活著

車主也打算再買一台新的Tesla




看那個A柱跟B柱幾乎是完好的,只有擋風玻璃破掉

不愧是當初測試車頂強度時把測試機器搞壞的Model S

前後行李箱就很慘,不過這當初就是設計來當成潰縮區,應該也算正常

車底可以看到有幾處刮傷,但是沒有破損的跡象

電池組應該沒有受損

http://i.imgur.com/IOIkJEt.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/QjubGmR.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/qVMGLHs.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/bipYrNm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/HEmJwNW.png

http://i.imgur.com/GnSzigk.png

http://i.imgur.com/EFsftvQ.png


原文連結:

https://electrek.co/2017/04/19/tesla-model-s-crash-cliff-save-life/

原文內容:

Tesla driver says Model S ‘saved his life’ after walking away unscathed
from a crash ~500-ft down a hill

We have reported before on Tesla owners crediting their vehicles’ safety
features for saving their lives after severe accidents, like when a Model
X crashed into a semi-truck earlier this year, but probably none as
spectacular as a crash that happened in California last week.

A Tesla Model S driver and his passenger walked away unscathed after
their vehicle tumbled ~500 feet down a cliff and ended up upside down in
a trail.
The driver, who wishes to remain anonymous, explained that a deer made
him swerve off the edge while he was driving on Grizzly Peak Blvd on his
way to the Oakland hills:

“While Driving perhaps a tad too spirited, a deer appeared at a curve at
the worst possible moment. I instinctively (mistakenly) swerved to avoid
it and my car ended up over the edge. We tumbled perhaps 150-200 feet
down a steep slope, ended up upside down.”

They later found that it was closer to 500 feet down from the road after
they had to tow the Model S back up.

He shared a few pictures of the slope where the car jumped off the edge:

After what the driver described as “the most terrifying seconds of his
life”, he and the passenger realised that they were both “totally OK –
with only bruises and muscle soreness”.

They were surprised to found that the interior cabin of the vehicle was “
totally intact”. It’s only when they climbed out of the car through the
sunroof that they realized the severity of the damages on the body of the
car.

It showed that the large crumple zones in Tesla’s vehicles (due to the
lack of an engine) can be very useful in high-velocity impacts –
sometimes even lifesaving. The driver said: “It felt rock solid to me
and I feel lucky to be alive because of my tesla.”

The roof also played a crucial role since the vehicle rolled and ended up
upside down. The sunroof detached itself midway down the cliff, but it
didn’t affect the strength of the Model S’ roof, which broke NHTSA’s
roof-crushing test equipment when they performed their crash tests. It
could register a result past 4Gs – meaning that 4 Model S’s could pile
up on another without the cabin caving in.

They managed to hike up the trail and get back OK, but since it happened
right before Easter weekend, they had to leave the Model S there.

Only yesterday (Tuesday), they were able to get the vehicle out of the
trail after the tow company spent 4 hours and used 550 feet of rope to
bring it back on the road:

The owner is already looking to get a new Tesla. he also recomends to
drive “a bit more cautiously” at night on those mountain roads.

--
Tags: 汽車

All Comments

Wallis avatar
By Wallis
at 2017-04-23T22:14
真是好車 難怪股價一直噴
Hardy avatar
By Hardy
at 2017-04-27T02:43
連側邊玻璃也沒爆 我的老神A在國道上翻一圈就爆光了
Sandy avatar
By Sandy
at 2017-04-29T06:34
玻璃沒爆是因為有樹枝緩衝
Candice avatar
By Candice
at 2017-04-30T11:11
又硬又會跑的車 買不起QQ
Edwina avatar
By Edwina
at 2017-04-30T15:55
特斯拉:潰縮區 牛頭牌:鋁罐
Barb Cronin avatar
By Barb Cronin
at 2017-04-30T17:06
特斯拉:走出來 牛頭牌:躺擔架
Thomas avatar
By Thomas
at 2017-05-05T08:15
電動坦克
Ula avatar
By Ula
at 2017-05-06T21:19
前後保桿的鋼樑看起來幾乎沒歪
Aaliyah avatar
By Aaliyah
at 2017-05-11T15:41
都沒潰縮 人怎麼沒有吸收衝擊力
Frederica avatar
By Frederica
at 2017-05-13T08:23
車頭車尾就是潰縮區啊
Enid avatar
By Enid
at 2017-05-17T04:26
真那麼硬的話,怎麼不敢學S5表演頂空貨櫃呢?
Dinah avatar
By Dinah
at 2017-05-17T19:17
不虧是美國貨 在台灣都死光了
William avatar
By William
at 2017-05-22T17:18
跟馬三對撞你ㄧ定輸
Suhail Hany avatar
By Suhail Hany
at 2017-05-24T19:30
這就是以後自動駕駛比較有爭議的地方
Olive avatar
By Olive
at 2017-05-27T23:22
以後自動駕駛是要閃鹿而衝下山谷 還是直接撞上去
如果是閃人呢
Kristin avatar
By Kristin
at 2017-05-29T09:53
會急煞吧
Ethan avatar
By Ethan
at 2017-05-31T00:13
10年造車工藝,海放50年的
Sierra Rose avatar
By Sierra Rose
at 2017-06-04T15:36
做太好難怪虧損
Mason avatar
By Mason
at 2017-06-08T16:32
這篇根本廣告吧 應該有優惠價了
Enid avatar
By Enid
at 2017-06-12T06:31
這個電影全民公敵就演過啦 機器怎麼判斷? 人又會怎麼判斷?
Una avatar
By Una
at 2017-06-13T00:56
cowbe 五六十公尺!?
Noah avatar
By Noah
at 2017-06-14T13:47
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zs8HLogyl2A
Noah avatar
By Noah
at 2017-06-15T21:39
不就跟這一樣而已,不只車窗沒破連前後都沒事喔
Oscar avatar
By Oscar
at 2017-06-19T20:45
山坡衝出去本來就不會比平地翻滾嚴重,是在那邊有多硬
Faithe avatar
By Faithe
at 2017-06-21T23:31
你這新聞剛下去就被樹卡住了..
Zanna avatar
By Zanna
at 2017-06-26T12:56
依AP來說 會以保護車內人為優先
Ida avatar
By Ida
at 2017-06-29T23:11
如果是裕隆?
Joe avatar
By Joe
at 2017-07-04T05:04
特斯拉:正確的潰縮 神A:哈哈 變小Y
Daph Bay avatar
By Daph Bay
at 2017-07-07T06:43
誰叫神A整台車都是潰縮區www
Daniel avatar
By Daniel
at 2017-07-09T09:18
比較好奇天窗不是翻車朝下嗎?怎麼從天窗出來
Connor avatar
By Connor
at 2017-07-14T02:17
看圖說故事(造謠):後面被是VIOS追撞的,根本鋁罐
Anonymous avatar
By Anonymous
at 2017-07-18T07:54
真的是潰縮區 車室也太完整
Brianna avatar
By Brianna
at 2017-07-21T20:09
實際路況的判斷還是比較複雜的
Zenobia avatar
By Zenobia
at 2017-07-26T10:49
例如 雙向單線公路 路邊是草坪 自駕車跟著前方一台大巴士
車速較快
Tracy avatar
By Tracy
at 2017-07-31T04:39
路上有人 前方大巴閃過 後面自駕車怎麼反應
1閃對向 2閃草坪 3煞車不及撞上去
Andrew avatar
By Andrew
at 2017-08-04T18:30
若是同樣的狀況 路邊是懸崖呢?
Delia avatar
By Delia
at 2017-08-05T11:58
若是對向有大車呢
Sarah avatar
By Sarah
at 2017-08-06T02:57
自駕車能降低事故發生 但是無法避免的時候 就會有爭議
的確是很困難的事
Queena avatar
By Queena
at 2017-08-06T21:16
真的很屌
Mary avatar
By Mary
at 2017-08-11T03:38
應該會閃草坪 之前有類似情況在交流道口 是閃到槽化線上
詳細情況還要看車輛相對位置跟雷達捕捉到的地理狀況
Eden avatar
By Eden
at 2017-08-14T06:41
如果程式是寫剎車 但是撞到人 外人會說自駕車怎麼不閃草坪
Kumar avatar
By Kumar
at 2017-08-17T18:14
若是程式寫閃草坪 那要能分辨草坪 邊坡 懸涯
Emily avatar
By Emily
at 2017-08-18T13:01
程式不會也不可能窮舉組合 只會去估算怎樣做比較安全
Yedda avatar
By Yedda
at 2017-08-23T03:04
具體作法應該是分析各個狀況危險值去選最低的 或反過來
跟阿發狗下棋的子力判斷一樣 那是ML累積出來的東西
Agnes avatar
By Agnes
at 2017-08-25T10:42
判斷邊坡或草坪理論上早就辦到了 之前預測前車撞車
Mason avatar
By Mason
at 2017-08-27T18:19
就是雷達對地面的反射波 加上後來導入NV的視覺化學習
分辨有形的東西對目前的AP來說有兩三種以上的手段
William avatar
By William
at 2017-09-01T06:46
各家都不成問題 多準而已 像MobileEye或Uber的出包就會被
大肆提起 然後最速修復 或低調w
Audriana avatar
By Audriana
at 2017-09-04T14:42
人沒事 怎樣都好 問題在人有事的時候
今天下邊坡運氣好沒事 也只是運氣好
Olivia avatar
By Olivia
at 2017-09-06T02:41
唯一有的 就像你講的 不可避免的車禍 怎麼選
Sierra Rose avatar
By Sierra Rose
at 2017-09-09T17:19
這點最近有個人投稿TechNews 我覺得寫得算不錯
Aaliyah avatar
By Aaliyah
at 2017-09-11T10:03
欸 先問 這篇是真的AP開下山嗎?
Emma avatar
By Emma
at 2017-09-15T11:35
投稿內容大意是 不可避免的車禍 人為造就的道路環境
遠比AP高得多 反過來講 普及AP 單純化路況
Vanessa avatar
By Vanessa
at 2017-09-19T17:22
反而能大幅減少這種電車難題 是相對安全的
那AP的道德議題 會從該撞誰 變成減少或消滅這種該撞誰的
情況
Vanessa avatar
By Vanessa
at 2017-09-22T22:58
特斯拉神話越來越強大了 XD
Aaliyah avatar
By Aaliyah
at 2017-09-26T20:54
做行銷吧 難道1A2B做不到?
Annie avatar
By Annie
at 2017-09-26T23:03
擔心電腦判斷速度?還是判斷能力?
Jessica avatar
By Jessica
at 2017-10-01T07:59
事故這種事情 你無法證明自己做的決定是最佳解
Delia avatar
By Delia
at 2017-10-03T21:45
就算你真的做了最佳解 只要有人傷亡 就有辦法說你不是最佳解
Kelly avatar
By Kelly
at 2017-10-05T09:45
也就是想說的人都會有話說 受害方也都會有話說
Candice avatar
By Candice
at 2017-10-09T01:12
其實可以配合google map等其他電子地圖 讓程式在周圍是
危險地帶時 強制避免進行閃避動作
Franklin avatar
By Franklin
at 2017-10-13T16:26
在周圍沒有表示危險的地區才開放閃避
Carol avatar
By Carol
at 2017-10-16T05:19
最佳解的問題 不侷限於AP呀
Gary avatar
By Gary
at 2017-10-18T11:18
掙扎的是 你願不願意把這種判斷交給非人類去處理
Gary avatar
By Gary
at 2017-10-21T02:58
電子地圖的話 也是有些麻煩的
會存在精度問題 再者也有所謂危險路段 是否存在安全區域
Jacob avatar
By Jacob
at 2017-10-24T11:51
現在應該還是以現場導向 畢竟牽扯到衛星 效率會太低
Lily avatar
By Lily
at 2017-10-28T19:38
衛星只要能讓車知道自己在那個區域 不要跳崖就好只是輔
助讓選擇收斂而已 再者後方交會測量除了得到座標這個值
以外 還可以算出誤差範圍 不過這也不重要 因為只是要作
為參考而已 車輛不是巡弋飛彈 無法排除SA效應
Margaret avatar
By Margaret
at 2017-11-02T10:25
比起效率 衛星更大的問題應該是 隱私吧
Megan avatar
By Megan
at 2017-11-03T17:02
會提效率是因為AP存在很大的即時處理需求 且事關安全
Elvira avatar
By Elvira
at 2017-11-08T01:27
若等待衛星回覆 變數太高 都開GPS了隱私應該沒啥考慮
Zanna avatar
By Zanna
at 2017-11-12T23:34
若GPS純做標示用輔助 那也存在是否有收斂選項的需求
Andy avatar
By Andy
at 2017-11-14T19:01
而且還得是AP無法或難以分辨所謂危險區域的路況
Belly avatar
By Belly
at 2017-11-16T00:43
這類輔助標示才具實質作用 畢竟要做全球性標示跟維護
Lily avatar
By Lily
at 2017-11-19T08:22
其實2樓也是活著阿 我神A威武!
Barb Cronin avatar
By Barb Cronin
at 2017-11-23T20:09
那是另外一種不小的功
Quanna avatar
By Quanna
at 2017-11-26T10:41
我活著是撿到的 靠內側撞 沒翻下去 沒倒翻沒起火沒追撞
Valerie avatar
By Valerie
at 2017-11-29T19:58
比如說逆時針環島開在台二線 可以輕易判斷左邊是海 遇
到緊急事故可以排除跳海 這是事前就可設定的選項
Mia avatar
By Mia
at 2017-12-03T20:02
應該是順時針方向 我果然不能分心
Gilbert avatar
By Gilbert
at 2017-12-05T16:07
這就要牽扯到衝撞護欄這個選項了
Catherine avatar
By Catherine
at 2017-12-07T01:04
不過這是針對台二這個例子 如果放大到一般道駕的話
就是上面說的 危險路段存在的安全區域
Anonymous avatar
By Anonymous
at 2017-12-09T13:43
全球標示的優點在於 目不可視的後方存在什麼
Dinah avatar
By Dinah
at 2017-12-13T03:49
人類可以判斷 AP會有困難 這時又回到精度之於即時性的問題
Queena avatar
By Queena
at 2017-12-16T08:46
總覺得這樣講跳太快了...
Gilbert avatar
By Gilbert
at 2017-12-17T16:00
翻車相對安全,受力面積大+支撐的車柱多
http://www.ettoday.net/news/20140208/323157.htm
Edith avatar
By Edith
at 2017-12-20T03:02
麋鹿測試fail
Zora avatar
By Zora
at 2017-12-24T04:56
運氣好吧,我記得iihs測model s的強度普通而已
Hedy avatar
By Hedy
at 2017-12-28T09:17
他一定很想換自動駕駛的版本XD
Eartha avatar
By Eartha
at 2017-12-30T23:22
車子翻車後 車頂在下 要怎麼樣從天窗爬出來? 會不會太奇怪?
Enid avatar
By Enid
at 2018-01-03T02:18
路上的障礙 是麋鹿 是人 是石頭 是紙箱 會有不同的選擇處理
Rae avatar
By Rae
at 2018-01-04T20:05
這些又攸關人命
Megan avatar
By Megan
at 2018-01-07T06:45
就現在做圖像辨識的 還是用大量資料庫去比對
車上怎麼做這個東西 儲存的資料庫不夠
Una avatar
By Una
at 2018-01-09T10:38
個人覺得還是蠻困難的事
Ivy avatar
By Ivy
at 2018-01-14T00:29
那紙箱裡可能會有什麼?就算是張海報 後面又有什麼?
Carolina Franco avatar
By Carolina Franco
at 2018-01-16T10:21
說過了 機器不會去窮舉這種可能性 更遑論連人也未知的情
Charlotte avatar
By Charlotte
at 2018-01-20T02:57
形 你那是人類的思維 實務也不可能把整個地球的有形物
Victoria avatar
By Victoria
at 2018-01-21T18:11
都存到資料庫去做判斷 只能把常見的放進去 剩下的都視為
障礙 盡量不撞上而已
Edward Lewis avatar
By Edward Lewis
at 2018-01-24T01:33
即便做了判斷 也只存在撞哪個優先權比較高而已
Mia avatar
By Mia
at 2018-01-28T19:58
就算換做人類 你也沒辦法瞬間辨識一閃而過眼前景物
Ina avatar
By Ina
at 2018-02-01T09:35
另外 圖像辨識的瓶頸向來不是容量 是速度與精度的取捨
Christine avatar
By Christine
at 2018-02-06T03:48
你採什麼演算法 Threshold多少 樣本比對範圍
Liam avatar
By Liam
at 2018-02-08T01:13
採樣的policy等等
George avatar
By George
at 2018-02-09T09:25
自己開就一定有最佳解嗎

道路考照

Agatha avatar
By Agatha
at 2017-04-20T01:09
習慣要養好 以後才不會累 首先要有三個觀念 1.不是每台車都有斜坡起步輔助 2.斜坡也可能會很斜 載重很重的時候(D檔仍會後退) 3.這是考駕照 照規矩 自排-上斜坡→踩腳煞車→拉手煞車→放腳煞車→放手煞車→補油門→順利爬坡 ...

北都、國都豐田汽車差異

Candice avatar
By Candice
at 2017-04-20T00:47
※ 引述《dakai579 (dakai579)》之銘言: : 北部的豐田汽車大概有兩個代理商,分別為北都以及國都,想請問版友們對這兩家的看法或比較? : 查了一下,國都不管在銷售量跟營業額都贏北都,不知道各位大大有什麼看法? : 有時候國都價開的低,有時又是北都開比較低,或是有業代也拜託幫我解答一下,謝謝大 ...

2017 Kuga 4T 北部 菜單

Enid avatar
By Enid
at 2017-04-19T23:59
胎尬吼 請各位前輩幫小弟看一下 這樣的菜單是否齊備 價錢是否合理 還有保單是否合理 謝謝大家 4T - Ecoboost 180 時尚經典型 白色 17年式, 17年製造, 車價99.9 空車折八萬 自費部份 ORO W420 +5500 行車記錄器: Mio688D 含16G記憶卡 含安裝 +89 ...

車子一些功能的必要性

Hazel avatar
By Hazel
at 2017-04-19T23:47
※ 引述《LoveWin7 (WIN 7再戰10年)》之銘言: : ※ 引述《u92202 (綠茶無糖少冰)》之銘言: : : 最近在看新車 : : 發現有些車場的等級差異都是差在一些額外的功能 : : 例如:抬頭顯示器、定速裝置、電動摺疊後照鏡、前/後霧燈 : : 想請問一下這些東西真的都會用到嗎? : : ...

suzuki vitara 1.6

Isla avatar
By Isla
at 2017-04-19T23:41
小的因為二手老車修不停的困擾 日前有了換車的念頭 一開始就鎖定Suzuki Vitara (油耗,馬力,安全性...) 外型也挺合我的胃口 空間也夠用 試駕之後就不猶豫的決定下訂了1.6白(因為預算考量) 菜單也許不是最優 優惠一萬 另送影音系統10吋(Autonet)及三寶 業代熱心服務 是個不 ...