奧迪A8的LV3自駕能力跳票 - BMW

Table of Contents

連結:https://www.motor1.com/news/418944/audi-a8-no-semi-autonomous-system/

原文和翻譯:

Before Audi revealed the fourth-generation Audi A8 that’s on sale today, the
company announced it’d offer it with Level 3 semi-autonomous driving capabili
ties. It went on sale two years ago, and Audi has yet to deploy the technology
, and it appears it won’t do so anytime soon. A new report from Automotive Ne
ws says the company “has abandoned plan to introduce” the tech, which Audi c
alls Traffic Jam Pilot, to its A8 luxury sedan.

原本奧迪宣布第四代A8將會有LV3自駕能力,在上市兩年後的今天,奧迪依然沒有開放這
個能力,而最新消息指出此計畫已被放棄。

Audi introduced the technology before regulators allowed it, promising to acti
vate the system in the appropriate markets where such tech was legal. However,
regulators remain stymied, and there’s still no consensus on how to regulate
even the most basic Level 3 semi-autonomous driving system, according to the
publication. Level 3 systems are designed to allow the driver to engage the sy
stem and take his eyes off the road to read or watch a movie, though the drive
r may be required to take over in an emergency.

奧迪在相關立法還沒有完成之前就宣示了此項科技,原本希望能帶動願意開放的市場。但
各國立法機構不為所動,而且事實上根本對於如何規範LV3沒有頭緒。LV3的定義是駕駛可
以完全把車子交給電腦,但電腦發出緊急警告時還是要隨時接手。

There’ve been hurdles within Audi, too. Sources told the publication that cor
porate lawyers are leery of the tech, which shifts the liability from the driv
er to the automaker when the system is engaged. Audi Technical Development bos
s Hans-Joachim Rothenpieler said that the excitement around Level 3 systems “
has subsided substantially.” If the system were piloting the car when it got
in an accident, Audi would be responsible.

除了外在因素,奧迪內部也有許多反對。內部律師警告LV3會把出事責任從駕駛轉到車廠
上。奧迪的技術開發主管 Rothenpieler 也說LV3系統已經不再是令人期待的目標。

Some automakers are skipping Level 3 altogether, like Volvo, whose CEO called
the tech “unsafe.” Fully self-driving cars are still several years away, and
without Audi’s Level 3 tech arriving anytime soon, the next step in autonomo
us cars may come from the likes of Mercedes and BMW with their S-Class and iNe
xt, respectively. The tech will advance incrementally until one day when cars
lack pedals and a steering wheel.

其他車廠早已決定完全跳過LV3,例如 Volvo的CEO就曾經說LV3並不安全。看來全自駕系
統還要好幾年才會問世,下一個能期待的進步可能是賓士的S-class或BMW的iNext。自駕
科技在沒有方向盤跟踏板的車問世前只能慢慢來。

心得:

所以不要再說奧迪有什麼LV3了,根本做不出來。我也同意其實LV3當初這樣定義反而更難
做。直接跳到LV4不管法規上還是技術上都更合理。

--

All Comments

Olga avatarOlga2020-05-05
不管有沒有,我都買不起.嗚嗚
Harry avatarHarry2020-05-09
瞧副教主高潮到連分類都不會了呢 XDDD
Thomas avatarThomas2020-05-13
這說法就跟蘋果不再跟台積電下單7奈米製程產品一樣XD
Jessica avatarJessica2020-05-18
S系列...
Joe avatarJoe2020-05-19
會編輯怎麼不會分類? 找到資料讓你覺得開心是嗎?
Gary avatarGary2020-05-20
沒關係我們有心靈自駕
Brianna avatarBrianna2020-05-24
你特威武
Elizabeth avatarElizabeth2020-05-26
讓我們繼續等Model3自己出門賺錢
Erin avatarErin2020-05-31
還有另一車廠 L3 已經上路
Callum avatarCallum2020-06-03
話說這Lv3限制大到我都看不出跟Lv2差別
Aaliyah avatarAaliyah2020-06-03
要高速公路 而且要塞車到60km/h以下
Barb Cronin avatarBarb Cronin2020-06-08
這種Lv3真的搞出來一點意義都沒有 -_-a
Callum avatarCallum2020-06-09
現在你各位就是全速域ACC含STOP&GO+全速域車道置中
的LV2買起來就對了
Lydia avatarLydia2020-06-09
然後台灣先等個10年過渡LV4
Olive avatarOlive2020-06-13
看內文並非做不出來,而是發生事故時號稱是lv3的車廠也
Daniel avatarDaniel2020-06-14
要負責,他們不願意擔責任所以不推了
Damian avatarDamian2020-06-15
反過來..現在車子沒有Level2或是外場改的..幾年後二手價都會
更難看
Belly avatarBelly2020-06-20
十年後應該LV.2 ADAS都是強制標配了
Hazel avatarHazel2020-06-22
說的好像LV4車廠不用負責似的....
Margaret avatarMargaret2020-06-27
不重要,反正買不起QQ
Bennie avatarBennie2020-06-30
各大廠其實就是不想花大錢惹,等別人的技術才快
Edward Lewis avatarEdward Lewis2020-07-04
LV3就有爭議,要就LV2(人為主),不然LV4(電腦為主)
Jake avatarJake2020-07-08
文內寫了不是技術不到,是各國法律不開放
Iris avatarIris2020-07-09
只要路上大部分的車有聯網+level2 自然就可以到level4
Regina avatarRegina2020-07-12
去除掉大部分人的操作,自然而然就不會有安全性問題
Joe avatarJoe2020-07-15
現實是很多人以為特斯拉有level 4,實際只有level 2,
而且評價還墊底
https://i.imgur.com/izOkdMO.jpg
George avatarGeorge2020-07-17
這張圖我覺得有瑕疵啦!上面幾名的都是level4的
Anonymous avatarAnonymous2020-07-19
拿來跟Tesla level2比較有點...
Heather avatarHeather2020-07-22
拿Tesla level2和個家level2比較,以功能面來說,Tesl
a 是比較齊全的...
Isabella avatarIsabella2020-07-24
附帶一提 這Lv3名字超搞笑 叫做Traffic Jam Pilot
Candice avatarCandice2020-07-28
擺明就是告訴你只有塞車能用 而且還只能塞封閉道路
Elma avatarElma2020-07-30
不是說這不好用 但是這很多Lv2其實都做得到的
Elma avatarElma2020-08-01
封缸那張圖是只概略分執行力跟策略,細項分數有10個
Carolina Franco avatarCarolina Franco2020-08-03
但Tesla"技術"這項分數的確低於多數競爭者
Jake avatarJake2020-08-07
那張圖是今年初發表的2019年Navigant Research
2017的Navigant Research Tesla排名還在比較前面
Yedda avatarYedda2020-08-10
但2017時Tesla在技術項分數就不高了
Lucy avatarLucy2020-08-13
哪裡好笑? 廣泛使用的輔助駕駛又不直接等於自駕能力
Anthony avatarAnthony2020-08-16
Tesla是敢開放ADAS功能 但不等於技術領先其他廠
Doris avatarDoris2020-08-20
那叫"輔助駕駛" Navigant Research認為Tesla雖然開
Robert avatarRobert2020-08-24
放最多ADAS功能在市售車上 但車上硬體感測器配置難
Tracy avatarTracy2020-08-27
以達到Lv4 Lv5全自駕目標 所以技術這塊分數給很低
Daph Bay avatarDaph Bay2020-08-29
https://i.imgur.com/akwFjWp.jpg 時間證明是退步啊
Puput avatarPuput2020-09-01
因為大家都是用lidar做level4,只有tesla堅持不使用,
所以以level4的觀點真的是退步的!但現實上你買不到li
dar的車子...
Charlotte avatarCharlotte2020-09-03
而且啊!以lidar的技術來說,是打光量測時間差,但是
如果周圍的每台車都打這種光出來!不會互相干擾嗎?
Connor avatarConnor2020-09-06
所以我的觀點,實驗車與量產車技術上本來就有差異,這
樣比較其實基準不同
Iris avatarIris2020-09-07
奧迪不是車子都可以上月球了嗎