Tesla安全聲明槓上NHTSA 兩邊都沒錯 - 特斯拉

Oliver avatar
By Oliver
at 2019-08-11T00:55

Table of Contents

富比士文章指出為何特斯拉跟美國國家公路交通安全局的雙方主張都沒錯

原文連結:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/bradtempleton/2019/08/08/tesla-and-nhtsa-spar-ove
r-tesla-safety-claims-theyre-both-right/#51b8b4110388

原文內容:
Last October, the NHTSA, the federal agency that (among other things) does saf
ety crash tests wrote a letter to Tesla, telling them not to say things like
“Model 3 achieves the lowest probability of injury of any vehicle ever tested
by NHTSA” and “But when a crash happens in real life, these test results sh
ow that if you are driving a Tesla, you have the best chance of avoiding serio
us injury.”? Car companies who do the tests have to follow regulations about
how they express the results, and NHTSA says Tesla’s marketing breaks those r
ules, and ordered them to stop. Tesla said they won’t stop — I’ll get into
why they would be this defiant below.

When NHTSA does a test, they slam a car into walls and barriers.? They calcula
te a score based on, among other things, how the crash test dummies come out o
f it. The Tesla Model 3 did indeed get the best score ever, and this is part o
f why I bought mine.

NHTSA doesn’t want Tesla saying those claims because it declares that the num
bers can’t be compared between cars that are very different in weight.? That
even if the test did indicate that you would do better in a Tesla Model 3 than
any other car hitting a wall, this might not be true if your Tesla crashes in
to a safely designed Hummer or even an unsafely designed transport truck.

In boxing, they sometimes try to judge boxers on what they call a “pound for
pound” comparison, trying to score them independently of their weight. Mostag
ree that Sugar Ray Robinson was, pound-for-pound, a much better boxer than Mik
e Tyson. But if you had to bet on one in a fight, you would probably bet on Ty
son.

Tesla notes that the Model 3 is heavy as cars go, and it is, because of its ba
ttery pack, but it’s still not a truck.

NHTSA is not saying the Tesla isn’t the safest car ever.? Rather, they are sa
ying, because their tests can’t be used to compare cars of very different wei
ght, they don’t have the answer to that question, and Tesla should not imply
they have said this. They’re right, and probably have the legal authority
to demand this. But Tesla’s score is very impressive, and very likely means t
hat “pound for pound” it is the safest car made so far, and the safest of an
y car, regardless of weight, in a crash against a stationary object. That’s s
omething to be proud of. And while NHTSA says their scores are not approved to
be compared between weight classes, that doesn’t mean that it might be possi
ble to do so.

So why would Tesla defy NHTSA on this, and not simply come up with more subtle
ways to say their message? I have a cynical suspicion that they don’t mind a
ll the press this battle has generated; you’re reading some of that press now
. It’s a nice thing to see tons of press about the very fine points of how yo
u define “safest car ever” and who can say what, because the main thingleft
in the mind of the public is a very positive message for Tesla.

重點翻譯:

NHTSA 的撞擊測試是用一面牆,然後根據撞擊的結果來算出一個分數。Model 3 的確拿到
了有史以來的最高分,那為什麼 NHTSA 不希望特斯拉主張 Model 3 是有史以來最安全的
車呢?因為實際車禍不會只是撞一面牆,有可能撞到一台安全性也高的悍馬,或是一台根
本不符合安全規定的改裝貨車,這都有可能讓 Model 3 撞擊結果不符合測試結果。

用拳擊來比喻的話,可能一個輕量級的選手擁有有史以來最好的數據,但對上一個數據稍
低的重量級選手,你可能還是想賭後者贏。

NHTSA 並沒有直接否認「Model 3 是有史以來最安全的車」這句話,而是說他們的分數不
能拿來比較重量差很大的不同車款,所以他們不希望特斯拉這樣比較。

但是特斯拉也沒錯,不管是跟同重量級的車比較,或是跟不同重量的車只比撞牆,Model
3 的確就是最安全的車。

作者另外還懷疑,特斯拉刻意繼續這樣比較的原因是這類的報導讓 Model 3 跟「有史以
來最安全」這個關鍵字持續曝光,當作免費的正面宣傳。

心得/說明:(30字以上)

所以說 Model 3 是有史以來最安全的車並沒錯
但是以 NHTSA 的立場 應該要加上兩個條件
1. 只跟同重量級車比
2. 跟不同級車比 只比撞牆
Model 3 如果撞上火車 當然還是火車比較安全
但是跟同級車比它的確是有史以來最安全


*轉錄新聞/情報,必須附上原文及網址連結心得或意見30字(不含標點符號)

--

All Comments

Jacob avatar
By Jacob
at 2019-08-11T08:05
Smart:
William avatar
By William
at 2019-08-13T19:43
車輛相撞時,車上的人沒當場死亡或昏迷的話,會有一陣
Zora avatar
By Zora
at 2019-08-18T06:53
子處在有意識但身體完全沒辦法反應的狀態(類似鬼壓床)
Ivy avatar
By Ivy
at 2019-08-21T00:44
所以 應該要買火車= =
James avatar
By James
at 2019-08-21T21:10
英文裡面的亂碼…好多
Hedwig avatar
By Hedwig
at 2019-08-23T05:27
好多亂碼
Isla avatar
By Isla
at 2019-08-23T16:25
有什麼市售車撞的火車?
現在有什麼市售車撞的贏火車?
Dora avatar
By Dora
at 2019-08-27T14:53
按照鋼鐵人的個性,大概下一秒會每台車買來對撞一次,看
看是不是比較安全
Mary avatar
By Mary
at 2019-08-30T23:19
依他個性應該是說 因為重量考量 可能X還是更安全
Ursula avatar
By Ursula
at 2019-09-03T01:48
這樣講的話NHTSA不是自打臉?都知道馬路上千變萬化了,
用牆測試的意義在哪?
Gilbert avatar
By Gilbert
at 2019-09-03T12:09
這樣比永遠比不完阿
Olive avatar
By Olive
at 2019-09-04T01:32
用牆就是自己撞自己啊 但重的車在現實有優勢
Yedda avatar
By Yedda
at 2019-09-06T19:32
說穿了就是用字遣詞的問題 類似的案例就AutoPilot
Olga avatar
By Olga
at 2019-09-08T10:09
基本上就是特斯拉考了98分 然後 NHTSA 說九十分以上都是 A
Poppy avatar
By Poppy
at 2019-09-08T20:43
特斯拉不能說最高分只能說你拿到 A
Ula avatar
By Ula
at 2019-09-12T02:53
這點一堆人都沒注意到 以為小車高分會跟大車高分結果一樣
Skylar DavisLinda avatar
By Skylar DavisLinda
at 2019-09-12T11:50
NHTSA這樣要求有點過份,實驗室數據本來就是要量化,
Bennie avatar
By Bennie
at 2019-09-13T10:38
都跟撞牆比,合理,但要跟千萬種現實狀況比,怎麼比,
要大家開坦克嗎?
Adele avatar
By Adele
at 2019-09-17T18:47
如果撞牆不夠現實,那就改變實驗條件,讓實驗更符合現
Madame avatar
By Madame
at 2019-09-18T05:59
實,而不是做了實驗,又說不一定是這樣。
Anthony avatar
By Anthony
at 2019-09-22T15:54
就是不能完全用測試模擬街道各種變化,NHTSA才不願意T
esla就因此說他們是有史以來最安全
Ula avatar
By Ula
at 2019-09-26T17:34
火車那段在講什麼...邏輯要不要重修
Joseph avatar
By Joseph
at 2019-09-29T16:45
你測出來的數據,給人家誇大的理由,啊現在又不說你不要
這麼自大,我數據歸數據而已,真的話都給你說耶。
Rae avatar
By Rae
at 2019-10-03T10:13
本來就不能只看撞擊成績就下定論,但大家就是愛比分數啊
Quanna avatar
By Quanna
at 2019-10-04T17:11
簡單講就是安全啦
Hedy avatar
By Hedy
at 2019-10-07T19:27
NHTSA沒說撞牆成績最高就是最安全的吧
Iris avatar
By Iris
at 2019-10-10T12:45
誰說小車不安全 https://youtu.be/lh1qqWoUDKo 25秒開始
George avatar
By George
at 2019-10-13T04:37
eBay上賣的坦克車應該可以撞贏火車吧
Agnes avatar
By Agnes
at 2019-10-15T18:04
不行。坦克的噸數還是差火車一大截。頂多坦克變形不嚴重
,但乘員不保證生存。
Gilbert avatar
By Gilbert
at 2019-10-16T10:16
就跟前幾年特斯拉一直強調自動駕駛的情況一樣啊
Caitlin avatar
By Caitlin
at 2019-10-16T15:30
總統座車都換成tesla最安全

誇大 Model 3 安全性 美監管機構對特斯拉

Linda avatar
By Linda
at 2019-08-10T22:53
原文連結:https://auto.ltn.com.tw/news/13292/3 原文內容: 誇大 Model 3 安全性 美監管機構對特斯拉發「勒令停止函」 引用非營利機構 Plainsite 所釋出的 1 份文件指出,美國交通安全管理局(NHTSA) 在 去年發現,美國電動車大廠特斯拉(Tesla) ...

Tesla加入鏽鏽家族 Model 3開一年就生鏽

Leila avatar
By Leila
at 2019-08-08T15:03
概覽: 當你正對Model 3超值的售價驚訝時,有沒有想過為什麼Tesla能夠賣的這麼便宜?是不是在用料上真的太省,甚至開了一年的新車竟然就生鏽了! ●烤漆品質差 ●連門板都生鏽 ●集體訴訟進行中 隨著即將在台灣上市的Tesla Model 3,台灣吹起了一片電動車浪潮,許多人看著那超值的售價準備購買,但現 ...

雙黃線逆向超車?

Lydia avatar
By Lydia
at 2019-08-07T10:29
是這樣的 今天肥宅來花蓮過情人節 在路上看到一部阿菌 又龜又慢還喜歡踩煞車 此刻...... 後面一部貨車忍不住了! 接著就跨雙黃線要超車 可是不知為何他跨完後不敢加速.... 請問這時後方的車子 可以卡進貨車騰出的位置嗎? http://i.imgur.com/XGJvTS8.jpg 如圖這樣 畫的很 ...

特斯拉超充即將收費

Anonymous avatar
By Anonymous
at 2019-08-05T19:55
小弟一直有個疑問, 如果特斯拉超充收費算賣電。 那自助洗衣店,10元5分鐘, 這樣業者算不算賣電? 還是因為他用時間計價沒這問題? 4.5kW的烘衣機, 10元5分鐘, 一小時就是4.5度,120元。 一度超過25塊。 大家覺得貴嗎? 如果電業法不能以度計價, Tesla是很容易規避的, 在有些國家就是 ...

車損後續處理評估

Franklin avatar
By Franklin
at 2019-08-05T17:06
小弟在田間小路跟宅急配貨車撞了一下 我為北向南,他為東向西 時速大概50 貨車車體基本上是沒事,我的就at%+.... 照片如下 https://i.imgur.com/t9iRJZN.jpg 我想問 車廠是說可以維修 請問鄉民們建議維修或者是報廢處理呢 4年車,里程數約75K - ...